Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane..."

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (hmg-ml@gmx.de)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 10:11:11 PST

Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Core testing group"

Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Mustek (Trust Imagery 1200SP) scanner prob"
In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 01:23:21PM +0100, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
> use <lalloca.h>

The question is if there is a lalloca.h on any system. I don't think
so (at least not on Linux, AIX, Irix and Solaris). On the other hand
lalloca.h isn't installed by SANE anyway so there shouldn't be a
problem. So "../include/lalloca.h" is ok for consistency and to make
it clear for the reader that this is a local header.

Bye,
Henning

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Core testing group"
Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Mustek (Trust Imagery 1200SP) scanner prob"
In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 11:25:31 PST