is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]

• Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Agfa 1212U problems?"
• In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jochen Eisinger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> [Oliver Rauch]
> > In the manpage of getopt it is described that
> > #include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
> > to be used or we get problems when getopt is
> > available at the system.
> >
> > With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
> > a problem here to keep it as it is.
>
> The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
> use <lalloca.h>
>
>

Hi,

does anyone know if lalloca.h is installed on any system?
if not, we should use "lalloca.h" or "../include/lalloca.h"
otherwise we should use <lalloca.h>

Bye
Oliver

-
Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

• Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
• Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Agfa 1212U problems?"
• In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:54:48 PST