Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane..."

From: Jochen Eisinger (jochen.eisinger@gno.de)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 04:23:21 PST

Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""

Previous message: Karsten Strunk: "Agfa Snapscan-problem"
In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

[Oliver Rauch]
> In the manpage of getopt it is described that
> #include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
> to be used or we get problems when getopt is
> available at the system.
>
> With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
> a problem here to keep it as it is.

The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
use <lalloca.h>

-- jochen

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Previous message: Karsten Strunk: "Agfa Snapscan-problem"
In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 04:20:01 PST