Jochen Eisinger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> [Oliver Rauch]
>
> > It does not look like a problem that does occur often, but
> > I also do not see a problem to change all to
> > #include "../include/sane/sane*"
> >
>
> I also think the "../include/sane/..." style is the best... I've added a
> little script to change this in all files but the frontends (where
> saned.c & test.c can't be frontends, because they include sanei_*.h
> files which shouldn't be accessable to frontends)
Hi Jochen.
Frontends also may have access to sanei_*.
The sanei_* files shall not be installed on the system directories
because they are not part of the sane standard, but a frontend may
use these routines. If we move a frontend out of the backend-package
we also have to copy some sanei_* routines to the frontend-package
(already done for xcam and xscanimage).
> What about the same problem in this favour: "lalloca.h" vs <lalloca.h>
> (or "getopt.h" vs <getopt.h>)? In this case we should write something
> like this:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_LALLOCA_H
>
> #include <lalloca.h>
>
> #else
>
> #include "../include/lalloca.h"
>
> #endif
>
> any comments?
>
In the manpage of getopt it is described that
#include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
to be used or we get problems when getopt is
available at the system.
With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
a problem here to keep it as it is.
Bye
Oliver
-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 03 2000 - 23:03:52 PST