Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane..."

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:46:28 PST

  • Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""

    Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 01:23:21PM +0100, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
    > > The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
    > > use <lalloca.h>
    >
    > The question is if there is a lalloca.h on any system. I don't think
    > so (at least not on Linux, AIX, Irix and Solaris). On the other hand
    > lalloca.h isn't installed by SANE anyway so there shouldn't be a
    > problem. So "../include/lalloca.h" is ok for consistency and to make
    > it clear for the reader that this is a local header.

    Let's change it this way and we will find out if there is any
    system that has problems with this.

    Bye
    Oliver 

    -- 
Homepage:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
sane-umax:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
xsane:		http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:54:49 PST