Hi,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:21:32AM -0400, DeeCeeOne wrote:
> Yes indeed, should we go with generic lm983x (meaning whole line starting
> >from lm9830) or just the easy way and do only lm9831-lm9833?
I think lm9831-33 is enough as the lm9830 is parport, not USB. I
didn't even know that there is a lm9833.
> I got (my own) Canon Canoscan N650U (lm9832 on board) , the spec
> sheets from NS and from the Merlin project, and I'm eager to do
> something with them while I still have some free time.
I think after we find out about the existing code we should start writing some
kind of mechanism to set the basic values of the chip depending on the
scanner type.
Bye,
Henning
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 11:04:25 PDT