Yes indeed, should we go with generic lm983x (meaning whole line starting
from lm9830) or just the easy way and do only lm9831-lm9833? I got (my own)
Canon Canoscan N650U (lm9832 on board) , the spec sheets from NS and from
the Merlin project, and I'm eager to do something with them while I still
have some free time.
Best regards,
Adam
P.S. psssst sourceforge...
----- Original Message -----
From: Jaeger, Gerhard <gjaeger@sysgo.de>
To: Henning Meier-Geinitz <hmg-ml@gmx.de>; <sane-devel@mostang.com>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [dev] Status of NS LM983x USB support (e.g. Bearpaw, Canon
650U, Plustek OpticPro U12)
> Hi Henning, hi list,
>
> I'd like to support you in writing such a backend. I have obtained source
code
> from Plustek and a test device (Optic Pro UT12).
> I first planned to integrate the USB support into the current
Plustek-backend
> (for parallel port scanners), but as there are quite a lot of other LM983x
based
> scanners, I think it will be much better to have one "generic" backend for
these
> devices.
>
> As soon as I have some time, I will check the stuff that you already have.
> Gerhard
>
> On Son, 08 Apr 2001, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to ask everyone who worked on drivers or other programs
> > for LM983x based scanners what's the status of this work. I had quite
> > a lot of questions about these scanners and some people offered help.
> > If I remeber correctly, there is even a CVS repository for some code.
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 05:04:44 PDT