Re: What about the #include <sane/...> statements in the header files?

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (hmg-ml@gmx.de)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:06:05 PDT

  • Next message: Malcolm Farmer: "Re: SANE can't see Epson Perfection 1200S"

    Hi,

    On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 06:17:34PM +0200, Oliver Rauch wrote:
    > sane should only install the header sane.h and saneopts.h.
    > The headers sanei*.h are only for sane internal (thats why it
    > is called sanei) usage. sanei*.h should not be installed
    > to the system. (should be fixed in sane-1.0.4)

    Uh, I forgot about this. So no change is needed here.

    > I think:
    > scanimage - should be kept in the sane package
    > xscanimage - should be published in an own package
    > xcam - should be published in an own package

    Additionally the japi stuff.

    > In the most cases a user needs only one of xscanimage/xsane,
    > so it does not make sense to create a package that includes both
    >
    > xcam is only interesting for cameras or may be the bttv backend.
    > So most users do not need it.

    So make a package with xcam, xscanimage and the Java backend?

    > are there any time-plans for sane-1.0.4?

    Don't know I will need some more weeks to fix some bugs in mustek.c ...

    Ciao,
      Henning

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:14:16 PDT