Re: Compiling on OS/2

From: stef (stef-listes@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 10:05:13 PDT

  • Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: HP Scanjet 2200C"

    On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:42:26AM +0200, Paul Floyd wrote:
    > I had a go at building sane 2001-06-05 yesterday. Roughly, these were my
    > experiences:
    >
    > 1. The new os2unix script is a big improvement over plain old configure.
    >
    > 2. pgcc croaked when trying to compile canon.c, so I switched back to old emx
    >
    > 3. lots of problems with the snapscan USB code, which I simply #defined away
    > => I would have thought that the reason for having separate snapscan-scsi.c
    > and snapscan-usb.c was to have the interfaces cleanly divided between
    > the two files; there are however several USB references in the SCSI file.
    >
    > 4. Also quite a few problems with umax_pp_low.c. This file does include the emx
    > header required for the functions to access byte/word input/output, but the body
    > of the file refers only to the Linux gcc style functions. I think the answer is
    > to use a few #defines like
    >
    > #define _insp inb (or whatever).
    >

            This point is (hopefully) fixed in latest CVS for OS/2 EMX+gcc.

    Regards,
            Stef

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 11 2001 - 09:51:24 PDT