Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:50:47AM +0200, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> /proc/bus/usb/devices says vendor id=05d8 (Artec/Ultima?),
> prod id=4002. So I installed the scanner module with this
> options (vendor=0x05d8 product=0x4002).
If it was Mustek 1200 UB compatible, the vendor would be 0x055f and
product 0x0006. Maybe it works with the 1200ub backend nevertheless.
> I have sane 1.0.4 installed.
and the Mustek 1200UB backend?
> scanimage -L says "no SANE devices found".
> Running "strace scanimage -L says" reveals that /dev/usbscanner
> cannot be openend. "cat /dev/usbscanner" says "No such device".
> /dev/usbscanner is linked to /dev/usbscanner0, which is device
> 180/48.
Probabaly the kernel scanner driver couldn't detect/attach the
scanner.
> These are the syslog entries:
>
> syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert usb.c: registered new driver usbscanner
> syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: USB Scanner support registered.
> syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: probe_scanner: User specified USB
> scanner -- Vendor:Product - 5d8:4002
> syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: probe_scanner: Only two or three
> endpoints supported.
> syslog:Apr 27 01:18:41 kunibert scanner.c: open_scanner(0): Unable to access
> minor data
>
> Any hints?
The scanner module doesn't seem to be able to manage this scanner.
However, I don't know which additional endpoints the scanner supports.
Probabaly it's the best thing to contact one of the usb mailing lists
or the dveleoper of the Linux scanner module.
> Is this really a sane problem (no backend found) or some
> misconfiguration within the usb layer?
The scanner module seems to be the problem. However, I'm not suer if
the 1200UB backend will work when the scanner is detected correctly by
the scanner module.
Bye,
Henning
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 08:48:39 PDT