Hi,
> If SANE wasn't installed, scanimage would put out an error. The output
> above is only an example. pnm is disabeld by default in dll.conf. If
> you want to do tests, you can enable it by removing the "#" in front
> of pnm in dll.conf.
> If you expected your scanner to show up here, can you give more
> information abot the type of your scanner?
I'll follow up since I have a similiar problem.
I am running Linux 2.4.3, trying to connect a Lifetec 9452 (aka Aldi)
USB Scanner. There is some evidence that this scanner is compatible
to the Mustek 1200 UB, so its worth a try.
Carefully read the scanner.txt Documentation from the kernel
source, compiled usb-uhci, usbdevfs and usb scanner support
as modules and created the device files.
/proc/bus/usb/devices says vendor id=05d8 (Artec/Ultima?),
prod id=4002. So I installed the scanner module with this
options (vendor=0x05d8 product=0x4002).
I have sane 1.0.4 installed.
scanimage -L says "no SANE devices found".
Running "strace scanimage -L says" reveals that /dev/usbscanner
cannot be openend. "cat /dev/usbscanner" says "No such device".
/dev/usbscanner is linked to /dev/usbscanner0, which is device
180/48.
These are the syslog entries:
syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert usb.c: registered new driver usbscanner
syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: USB Scanner support registered.
syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: probe_scanner: User specified USB
scanner -- Vendor:Product - 5d8:4002
syslog:Apr 27 01:17:54 kunibert scanner.c: probe_scanner: Only two or three
endpoints supported.
syslog:Apr 27 01:18:41 kunibert scanner.c: open_scanner(0): Unable to access
minor data
Any hints?
Is this really a sane problem (no backend found) or some
misconfiguration within the usb layer?
Thanks, Thomas
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 01:48:17 PDT