Hi,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:36:18PM -0800, Daniel Kerry Hiltgen wrote:
> #0 0x400d18a7 in memcpy (dstpp=0x805a890, srcpp=0x805a894, len=4294967292)
> at ../sysdeps/generic/memcpy.c:55
> #1 0x402ca03e in sanei_w_space (w=0x805a83c, howmuch=4) at sanei_wire.c:84
> #2 0x402c9b78 in bin_w_word (w=0x805a83c, v=0xbffff780)
> at sanei_codec_bin.c:94
> #3 0x402ca248 in sanei_w_word (w=0x805a83c, v=0xbffff780) at sanei_wire.c:207
[...]
4294967292 is the maximum (32 bit) unsigned int value minus 4. So
maybe that's a signed/unsigned problem. If this was a byte order
problem shouldn't the result be:
0 0 0 4 is interpreted as 4 0 0 0 --> 67108864
Similar things happen if scanning via saned on localhost (something
like scanimage -d net:localhost:mustek:/dev/scanner). So I'm not sure
if this is a byte order problem. Maybe Jochen can talk about this, he
is looking for the local saned crashes. On the other hand there is a
TODO list entry:
* check net/saned
[...]
- don't just ignore the byte-order for theimage data (needed to
support depths > 8 bits/channel)
> Any thoughts? Can I provide more information that might be helpful in
> diagnosing the problem? (FWIW: Mustek 1200 LS)
Oh! I'm very interested in this scanner. Is this a Legal size or A4
scanner? Please send me the output (dbg.log) of the following
command:
SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK=5 scanimage -L 2>dbg.log
Is it working with the Mustek backend without problems?
Bye,
Henning
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 10 2000 - 02:37:39 PST