Re: sane and gcc 2.96

From: Statux (statux@bigfoot.com)
Date: Sun Nov 19 2000 - 15:03:02 PST

Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane-1.0.3 fails to open device Ultima AT3 on m68k Linux"

Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
In reply to: Michael Vanecek: "sane and gcc 2.96"
Next in thread: Michael Vanecek: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Reply: Michael Vanecek: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Did they ever fix their _little_ problem with gcc 2.96 and the fact that
they didn't even bother to note that it's a development version that
produces incompatible object code.. such code that will never work with
anything else even in future releases?

On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Michael Vanecek wrote:

> Has anyone compiled with gcc 2.96 yet? I've got the RH version
> downloading now and am curious if there have been any problems...
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
>

-- -Statux

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane-1.0.3 fails to open device Ultima AT3 on m68k Linux"
Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
In reply to: Michael Vanecek: "sane and gcc 2.96"
Next in thread: Michael Vanecek: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Reply: Michael Vanecek: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 19 2000 - 14:48:45 PST