Oh fart. And I just got finished compiling the monster. It's version
2.96-54 if anyone knows the answer to the question below. Should I ditch
the freshly made RPM's and go out and download the src.rpm's for 2.95.2
(the Mandrake should work for RH, right?). I guess I could always
download a tarball and write my own spec file... this bleeding edge
stuff can get nervy sometimes. I'd like to get a clean compile of sane
using what the core developers are using.
Mike
Statux wrote:
>
> Did they ever fix their _little_ problem with gcc 2.96 and the fact that
> they didn't even bother to note that it's a development version that
> produces incompatible object code.. such code that will never work with
> anything else even in future releases?
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Michael Vanecek wrote:
>
> > Has anyone compiled with gcc 2.96 yet? I've got the RH version
> > downloading now and am curious if there have been any problems...
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --
> > Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
> >
>
> --
> -Statux
>
> --
> Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 19 2000 - 15:19:12 PST