Re: snapscan vs. acer 310S

From: Wolfgang Goeller (wgoeller@active.ch)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2000 - 12:51:18 PDT

  • Next message: Simon Edwards: "Re: Acer 620ST update"

    Russ Burdick wrote:
    >
    > ok, i've finally got a bit of time to play with my scanner again and i've
    > been doing some work with my Acer Prisma 310S and the latest snapscan
    > backend (snapscan-20000514.tar.gz) and sane-1.0.2.
    >
    > from what i've gone through in the source it seem that this scanner has
    > the same id (and supposedly behavior) as the VUEGO310S. this brings me to
    > my first question for the list: is there anyone out there using a Vuego
    > 310S that has had success with any version of sane+snapscan? if the vuego
    > works and the acer doesnt, perhaps they're not the same inside and it'd be
    > worthwhile to start thinking about separating the two in the snapscan
    > code.

    You don't need to: If you visit the Vuego-Homepage you get to Acer!

    > the first two are color at different resolutions and the last three are
    > greyscale. the final image is of a slightly different area on my test
    > image since the top of the first one didnt seem all that interesting. this
    > is the one i find most interesting. it looks like the first 'block' is
    > clear, then the subsequent 'blocks' get more and more garbled. i should
    > also note that the resulting pnms (produced by xscanimage) 'appeared to be
    > truncated' according to xv, but the greyscale images were fine.

    Try to scan over the net - you will have the same distortion with the
    scnapscan.

    Regards
    Wolfgang

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 10 2000 - 12:54:45 PDT