Re: Recommend a USB scanner with Transparency Scanning

From: The Doctor What (list.sane@docwhat.gerf.org)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 10:55:42 PDT

  • Next message: Karsten Festag: "Re: [dev] microtek2 backend for SANE-1.0.5 ready for testing"

    * Geoff Ghose (geoff@focus.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu) [010518 11:41]:
    > I have a 1240U photo, but your not going to find it for $200. I think mine was about $300
    > with the transparency adapter. I think it's a very good scanner for its price.

    I hate it when prices go down *after* you buy it:
    Amazon has it for $217.94 /w free shipping.

    > I often scan 35 mm negative film, and I think the results are good
    > but not outstanding. I use a resolution of 1800 dpi, but anything
    > above 1200 is accomplished with interpolation and therefore might
    > want to be avoided. At these settings you have "mega-pixel"
    > resolution. The shortcoming is the optical density, although it's
    > not bad (3.0 I think), a larger dynamic range would really help.
    > For scanning slides, it is even more critical. (I've only scanned
    > negatives).

    Could you post an uncorrected 1200dpi negative scanned in? You can
    just mail it directly to me, if it'll be easier. (I don't want to
    SPAM the list).

    I'd like to see an example.

    Thanks for your help. :-)

    Ciao! 

    -- 
"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
	--Shakespeare, MacBeth, V:iv

    The Doctor What: Not that 'who' guy              http://docwhat.gerf.org/
docwhat@gerf.org                                                   KF6VNC

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 18 2001 - 11:37:12 PDT