On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:53:55AM -0700, Paul Nixon wrote:
> Anyway, I have *fixed* the scanner not found error I received earlier by
> relinking libsane.so.1 to libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.4.
That is almost certainly not what you wanted, even if it works. It will
prevent you from using another non-Snapscan scanner or a network scanner.
> Now, any chance someone might know what's causing my scanned image to look
> like it's been put through the shredder?? Once again, greyscale and lineart
> are fine. Color looks like it scans a bit then staircases, scans a bit, and
> so on.
It's quite possible that this is a backend problem.
> I thought xscanimage was a frontend to scanimage. Is this not so? Scanimage
> produces a perfect scan. Xsane-0.76 is also shredded, just not quite as bad.
No, scanimage and xscanimage are separate front ends, the only similarity
is the name and common contributors AFAIK.
Nick.
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 11 2001 - 12:01:12 PDT