Re: [snapscan] High resolution scanning

From: Oliver Schwartz (Oliver.Schwartz@gmx.de)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 03:26:57 PDT

Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: [snapscan] sane/xscanimage transparency support"

Previous message: Sebastien Sable: "Re: [snapscan] High resolution scanning"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Schwartz: "[snapscan] High resolution scanning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

> Maybe adding your model there would correct it. In this case, it seems
> that we should just remove the if test and put that as default
> behavior.

I tried that first thing yesterday, but it didn't change anything. In fact,
ps->absolute_max is also calculated to zero if you select 2400 dpi and a 21
cm scanning width.

Oliver

-- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: [snapscan] sane/xscanimage transparency support"
Previous message: Sebastien Sable: "Re: [snapscan] High resolution scanning"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Schwartz: "[snapscan] High resolution scanning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 11 2001 - 03:07:35 PDT