Re: RPM packaging in progress

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 01:20:44 PST

  • Next message: Christoph Knauer: "sane,saned und XSane/Windows"

    Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:

    > The mystery behind this decision does escape me. I ran 1.0.1 for a long
    > time without having to change things like this. Does any of the coders
    > have a clue why -O2 would be a problem?
    >

    Hello Hugo,

    There was a problem with optimization "-O2" about 1 or 2 years ago
    on some systems (original slackware?). The problem was that with
    enabled optimization "-O2" the compiler produced so much additional
    symbols that a maximum number (I think predefined in the compiler/linker)
    was exceeded while compiling the umax backend (and may be other backends too).

    Optimization level "-O2" should produce correct code.

    Bye
    Oliver 

    -- 
Homepage:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
sane-umax:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
xsane:		http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 01:18:00 PST