Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?

From: Nick Lamb (njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:07:46 PST

Next message: Bob Washburne: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"

Previous message: David Gesswein: "Reverse engineering scsi commands"
In reply to: Jeffrey H. Ingber: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"
Next in thread: Bob Washburne: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 10:56:29PM -0500, Jeffrey H. Ingber wrote:
> I just fired up xscanimage and noticed that the "bit depth" option in
> "Advanced Properties" only contains "8, 10, and 12" for the selection?

SANE counts bitdepth per-sample (ie Red, Green, Blue) so this is what
the original poster wanted, hardware that outputs 12 x 3 = 36 bpp

Note that SANE can't guarantee where the manufacturer got those extra
bits from. You can only hope that their sensors and optics are giving
you real data rather than noise, especially in the last bits.

Nick.

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Bob Washburne: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"
Previous message: David Gesswein: "Reverse engineering scsi commands"
In reply to: Jeffrey H. Ingber: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"
Next in thread: Bob Washburne: "Re: Which scanners REALLY provide 36 bit output? HP?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:06:59 PST