Re: sane fronten packages

From: Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Date: Sun Oct 22 2000 - 08:44:32 PDT

Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: bug in sanei_debug.h"

Previous message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Patches for sanei_debug.h/sanei_init_debug.c and the HP-backend"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[Oliver Rauch]
> what about "japi"? Does it work?

I do not know. If it works, it is an access library and I therefore
believe ig should be part of the backend package. If it doesn't, it
do no harm, and can just stay where it is. Why remove it?

Is there anyone who have tested the Java API? I have never tried it.

> Is scanadf an X based frontend or a command line frontend?

I believe it is a command line frontend, a modified/extended
scanimage.

The reason I want to split the SANE distribution in two, is to make it
simpler to install only the library if some application needs it.
There should be no need for X to install SANE. I'm not sure if this
was the original motivation for a split, and I do no longer remember
who first suggested to split the package.

-- ##> Petter Reinholdtsen <## | pere@td.org.uit.no

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: bug in sanei_debug.h"
Previous message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Patches for sanei_debug.h/sanei_init_debug.c and the HP-backend"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 22 2000 - 08:33:38 PDT