Re: sane fronten packages

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Fri Oct 20 2000 - 07:33:06 PDT

Next message: abel deuring: "Re: Problems with Acer ScanPrisa 640S"

Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
In reply to: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
Next in thread: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:

> I suggest splitting SANE in two:
>
> - all backends, documentation, scanimage and the Java library
> - all X frontends and scanadf.

Hi Petter,

what about "japi"?
Does it work?
If yes: then we should add a good instruction how to install it,
  create Makefiles for it etc. But I don`t think it should be kept
  in the sane backend package.
If no: we should remove it. It looks like there is no one
  working on it since 2 or 3 years.

I see no problem to make a xscanimage+xcam package.
Is scanadf an X based frontend or a command line frontend?

Bye
Oliver

-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: abel deuring: "Re: Problems with Acer ScanPrisa 640S"
Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
In reply to: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
Next in thread: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 20 2000 - 07:18:59 PDT