Re: xsane backend compatibility

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 04:36:07 PDT

Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: stupid questions (was: Invalid argument)"

Previous message: Nick Lamb: "Re: Invalid argument"
In reply to: Grega Bremec: "Re: xsane backend compatibility"
Next in thread: Bernhard Scheffold: "RE: xsane backend compatibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Grega Bremec wrote:
>
> BTW, Oliver, what's with that egcs bug you were talking about in
> connection with xsane? I've been experiencing occasional crashes when
> running standalone version, but apart from that everything seems fine.
>
> Anything specific to look for (f.e. optimization) or does it just "not
> work"? :-)
>
Hi Grega,

I think there are no more ecgs problems with recent ecgs versions.
There have been some ugly bugs in previous xsane versions
that may have been more visible with ecgs than with original gcc,
but I am not sure.

Bye
Oliver

-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: stupid questions (was: Invalid argument)"
Previous message: Nick Lamb: "Re: Invalid argument"
In reply to: Grega Bremec: "Re: xsane backend compatibility"
Next in thread: Bernhard Scheffold: "RE: xsane backend compatibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 04:21:45 PDT