Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 11:51:41AM +0200, Ivo wrote:
> Well, now that you mention it, at low resolutions and small widths,
> backtracking does not seem to occur. But when I increase the scan width with
> the same resolution, it will happen. If I up the resolution with the same small
> width, backtracking also occurs; and scanning is very slow, but that could be
> normal, i.e. even so with the Windows driver (haven't tried).
The behaviour is the same with windows but backtracking doesn't happen so
often.
> > > and as you can see in the debug output, buffersize is increased to 1024
> > > kb by the mustek backend.
> > I don't think this will help with ScanExpress/ScanMagic scanners. They like
> > their standard 64 K blocksize.
>
> But it won't have a negative effect either?
Probably it won't. However, with The ScanExpress/ScanMagic 1.x scanners a buffersize
>64 k may lead to a total freeeze of the scanner.
Bye,
Henning
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 09:42:14 PDT