Re: Umax 2200 (again!)

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:37:56 PDT

Next message: Steve Sheriff: "Re: sane 1.0.2 tar.gz"

Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane 1.0.2 tar.gz"
In reply to: Steve Sheriff: "Re: Umax 2200 (again!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Steve Sheriff wrote:

> > >
> > > 4. Can't quite see why there are xsane and xscanimage. Don't they do the same
> > > thing?
> > >
> >
> > If xscanimage does all you need you do not need xsane.
> >
> > Bye
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> It's just that we prefer the xsane interface. Where can we get the latest
> version of it?
>

From my homepage (see footer)

Bye
Oliver

-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Steve Sheriff: "Re: sane 1.0.2 tar.gz"
Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane 1.0.2 tar.gz"
In reply to: Steve Sheriff: "Re: Umax 2200 (again!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:33:58 PDT