Peter Ilott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got both the 1200 and 2200 Umaxs, and both worked great with my cheap adaptec
> card. (about $50 US). Did not try the umax card, but with an adaptec card you
> can attach other scsi devices at least !! It's worth t for ease of operation.
> Both work just fine in the GIMP !!
>
> me@Ilott.com
>
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Steve Sheriff wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > Thank you all for contributing to such a friendly list. I now have the
> > libraries needed to get SANE running under SuSE and have tested the software
> > interface. Thanks to all concerned.
> >
> > By reading the documentation, I have narrowed our choice of scanner(s) down to
> > Umax. There are problems however: 1. Availability in Spain, and 2. the need for
> > a proper Adaptec SCSI card to use it under Linux. We can get HP and Epson
> > scanners more or less on demand however.
> >
> > Are the Umax cards so bad that they are not workable? (a separate Adaptec card
> > is ridiculously expensive over here. I may be able to mail order *that* item but
> > shipping a Umax scanner is another matter I feel)
Hi,
Any recommendations for a scsi scanner that works with sane?
I was able to get 1.0.2 to build on my FIC VA-503+ but of course
I don't have a scanner connected to it yet! I couldn't get
xsane 0.57 to build as it crapped out in one of the files with
something about not being able to recognize a parameter in GIMP.
I'll rebuild and copy down the exact error code but I want to get
a scsi scanner. My machine(s) have Adaptec-2940UW cards or in the
case of the PR-440FX Pentium Pro machine, an onboard AIC-7880.
Is an HP 6350 worth it?
Best regards,
Kurt Savegnago
ksaves2@theramp.net
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 19:58:27 PST