Re: Re: [PARPORT] BETA test, new ppSCSI drivers

Bernd Schroeder (Bernd.M.Schroeder@gmx.de)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:55:54 +0200 (MEST)

> On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Bernd Schroeder wrote:
>
> > As a first step to solve the problem, please send me the output of
> > the scanner attributes. They are printed to stderr if you set
> > 'option dump 1' in the microtek2.conf file.
>
> Here is for Phantom 330 CX :
>
> --
>
>
> Scanner attributes from device structure
> ========================================
>
> Scanner ID...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Vendor Name: ' '
> Model Name: ' scanner 330CS '
> Revision: '1.28'
> Model Code: 0x94 (Phantom 336 CX or ScanMaker 330 CX)
> Device Type Code: 0x06 (Scanner),
> Scanner type: Flatbed scanner
> Supported options: Automatic document feeder: No
> Transparency media adapter: No
> Auto paper detecting: Yes
> Advanced picture system: No
> Stripes: No
> Slides: No
> Scan button: Yes
>
> Imaging Capabilities...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Color scanner: Yes
> Number passes: 1 pass
> Resolution: X-max: 300 dpi
> Y-max: 600 dpi
> Geometry: Geometric width: 2550 pts (8.50'')
> Geometric height: 3495 pts (11.65'')
> Optical resol. : 300
> Modes: Lineart: Yes
> Halftone: No
> Gray: Yes
> Color: Yes
> Depths: Nibble Gray: No
> 10-bit-color: No
> 12-bit-color: No
> d/l of HT pattern: No
> Builtin HT patt.: 0
> LUT capabilities: 1024 bytes
>
> Miscellaneous capabilities...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Data format: Line by line in segregated sequence,
> with color indicator
> Color Sequence: G - B - R
> CCD gap: 8 lines
> CCD pixels: 2550
> Calib wh str loc: -50
> Max calib space: 48
> Number of lens: 1
> Max no of windows: 8
> Sh trnsf func equ: 0
> Buffer type: Ping-Pong
> FEPROM: No

Looks rather normal. The only strange thing is that the height
of the scan area is 3495 points, which results in 11.65''. This
is slightly less than A4 size. Other models with an optical resolution
of 300 dpi have 3500 points or 11.70''. However, this shouldn't
cause any problems, because the backend uses this value to
calculate the actual size of the scan area.

One question: Do you have the same problems as Michele, that
there is an offset at the beginning of the scan area and that
the scan head tries to move beyond the scan area ?

Bernd

-- 
Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net



--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com