Re: Umax scanner woes (halp!)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Any sane-ready scanner with ADF ?"
• Previous message: Denis Prost: "Re: only negative output with scanimage (Canon Canoscan 300)"
• Maybe in reply to: genkai wa doko da: "Umax scanner woes (halp!)"
• Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax scanner woes (halp!)"

> hello,
>
> 1st my specs:
> Linux distort 2.2.9 #2 Thu May 20 12:16:24 /etc/localtime 1999 i586 unknown
> CPU: Pentium 166
> scsi card: Always 2000 scsi card(I unhooked everything from the scsi chain except the scanner to get contamination free results btw!)
>
>
> Detected scsi generic sga at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0
> find-scanner: found scanner " " at device /dev/sga
>
> [umax] Found scanner version on device /dev/sga
> [umax] attach_scanner: scanner-identification failed
>

Hi,

this looks very much like you have problems with your scsi card or bus.

How is your scanner terminated,
how long is the cable between scanner and computer,
how long is the scsi-cable in the computer,
how is the internal scsi bus terminated?

Bye
Oliver

--
EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch




--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Any sane-ready scanner with ADF ?"
 Previous message: Denis Prost: "Re: only negative output with scanimage (Canon Canoscan 300)"
 Maybe in reply to: genkai wa doko da: "Umax scanner woes (halp!)"

 Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax scanner woes (halp!)"