HP PhotoSmart R030 vs. SANE 1.01

Russ Price (rjprice@ais.net)
Sun, 25 Apr 1999 17:27:08 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: henk van der knaap: "Re: Microtek Scanmaker 35t+"
Previous message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: HEEEELP!!!!!!!!!!!"
Next in thread: abel deuring: "Re: HP PhotoSmart R030 vs. SANE 1.01"
Reply: abel deuring: "Re: HP PhotoSmart R030 vs. SANE 1.01"

I have one of these, and I've discovered that Kodachrome slides don't
look too good when scanned. Even at 300% exposure with high levels of
gamma correction, they still come out with a purplish tint. Are there
any things I can reasonably do to improve this? The slides come out fine
when using the windoze scanning software.

Also, when I scan a print, the preview window shows a bunch of jumbled
image strips at the bottom of the print. That being said, prints come
out quite well using SANE 1.01.

-- Russ Price - rjprice@ais.net - "Bus error (passengers dumped)"

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: henk van der knaap: "Re: Microtek Scanmaker 35t+"
Previous message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: HEEEELP!!!!!!!!!!!"
Next in thread: abel deuring: "Re: HP PhotoSmart R030 vs. SANE 1.01"
Reply: abel deuring: "Re: HP PhotoSmart R030 vs. SANE 1.01"