Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Re[2]: Silly question?"
• Previous message: John Profic: "Re[2]: Silly question?"
• Next in thread: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
• Maybe reply: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
• Reply: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
• Reply: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
• Reply: Graham Stoney: "Possible fix for Sane 1.0.1 segfault in RedHat 5.1 (net)"

Try running 'SANE_DEBUG_NET=128 scanimage -T' and report the output.
What is the exact command line when crashing? Try rerunning that
command line with 'SANE_DEBUG_NET=128' set.

The pnm backend is supposed to be full of bugs. Maybe you should try
with another backend?

-- 
##>  Petter Reinholdtsen <##    | pere@td.org.uit.no
 O-  <SCRIPT Language="Javascript">window.close()</SCRIPT>
http://www.hungry.com/~pere/    | Go Mozilla, go! Go!

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Re[2]: Silly question?"
 Previous message: John Profic: "Re[2]: Silly question?"

 Next in thread: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
 Maybe reply: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
 Reply: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
 Reply: Milon Firikis: "Re: Sane 1.01pre5 segfaults in RedHat 5.1 (net)"
 Reply: Graham Stoney: "Possible fix for Sane 1.0.1 segfault in RedHat 5.1 (net)"