Re: sane-0.3: it's almost for real now!

becka@sunserver1.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de
Tue, 17 Dec 1996 23:58:14 +0100 (MET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: sane-0.3: it's almost for real now!"
Previous message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: mail lossage?"
In reply to: Tristan Tarrant: "Re: sane-0.3: it's almost for real now!"

> Next up is the preview. At the moment the preview area is always A4 in
> size, but obviously the maximum size should come from the backend. Then
> I'll add the actual preview code. I am playing about with the various
> visuals.
> Also I have a little question: for backends like the PNM one, there is
> no max width/height. Should I set the preview area to some dummy size,
> changing it when the backend figures out the sizes,
This would be good. The pbmscan backend is not the only driver that will
show such a behaviour. Handscanners are the same (though it makes no sense
here to do a preview), but you can never know the length of a scan.
The same is true for several "Feeder-Type" scanners (what is a good english
word for those scanners ?) ...

CU,ANdy

-- Andreas Beck | Email : <becka@sunserver1.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de>

---
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.azstarnet.com/~axplinux/sane/
To unsubscribe:    echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@azstarnet.com

Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: sane-0.3: it's almost for real now!"
Previous message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: mail lossage?"
In reply to: Tristan Tarrant: "Re: sane-0.3: it's almost for real now!"