scc wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> It's the *only* way to get good results under Linux with our system. There is
> a 50 pin on an Adaptec 2904 (yes, not 2940) to a 25 pin that goes into one of
> the scanner sockets. Under windows, it produces garbage without the
> terminator.
>
> We have wasted months thinking that the scanner was at fault which is why we
> bought an Epson. At last we have seen why the Umax range are held in such
> esteem!
>
Hi.
I got a lot of feedback with problems with the Adaptec 2904 card on linux.
May be you have the chance to get it work with some options for the scsi-driver
... I don`t know.
Do you have the chance to try an other scsi controller?
I like the ncr53c8xx (ncr = symbios logic = lsi logic) controllers.
Especially the ncr53c810 controllers have been very interesting for
scanning (fast scsi => long cables) and have been not too expensive,
but as far as I know they are not produced any more.
If possible try the card before you buy one or make sure you can give
it back when it does not work.
Bye
Oliver
-- Homepage: http://www.rauch-domain.de sane-umax: http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax xsane: http://www.xsane.org E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@rauch-domain.de-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 03 2001 - 23:13:34 PDT