Re: [2001-05-30] umax_pp compile errors (raw I/O)

From: stef (stef-listes@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sat Jun 02 2001 - 12:17:09 PDT

  • Next message: stef: "Re: [2001-05-30] umax_pp compile errors (raw I/O)"

    On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:57:36PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
    > On architectures that don't have insb, outsb, and the rest (basically
    > everything but i386), the umax_pp backend doesn't build at all. I
    > think they should be autoconf'd for.
    >

            In fact, it is:

    .........
    static void
    Outsb (int port, unsigned char *source, int size)
    {
    #ifndef IO_SUPPORT_MISSING
      outsb (port, source, size);
    #endif
    }
    ..........

    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o: In function `Insb':
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o(.text+0xe92): undefined reference to `insb'
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o: In function `Outsb':
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o(.text+0xee2): undefined reference to `outsb'
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o: In function `Insw':
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o(.text+0xf32): undefined reference to `insl'
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o: In function `Outsw':
    > ../backend/umax_pp_low.o(.text+0xf82): undefined reference to `outsw'
    > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
    > make[1]: *** [umax_pp] Error 1
    >
    > Tim.
    > */

            Were inb/outb also undefined ? Or was it simply the string version of these ?

            So either IO_SUPPORT_MISSING was mis calculated, or your gcc doesn't have
    string I/O.

    Regards,
            Stef 

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 12:09:39 PDT