Re: big endian vs little endian

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@rauch-domain.de)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 14:01:08 PST

  • Next message: Mick Barry: "Re: big endian vs little endian"

    "William L. Sebok" wrote:
    > Has anyone else had this problem? Does the sane protocol have provision for
    > the case where front and back ends are on machines with different byte orders?

    Hi William,

    the sane-network protocol defines that the byte order has to be
    fixed in the network environment (sane-net/saned) when
    the frontend and backend do run on machines with differend endianess.

    I do not know if this already is implemented in the current version.

    Bye
    Oliver 

    -- 
Homepage:	http://www.rauch-domain.de
sane-umax:	http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax
xsane:		http://www.xsane.org
E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@rauch-domain.de

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 15:00:57 PST