On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Eugene Kanter wrote:
> >
> > > I am extremely puzzled again. There is a severe duplicate of efforts on
> > > this list
> >
> > Blame your poor announements. I started with checking the archives BEFORE
> > I started. There was no announcement in the archives.
> >
> > Checking on messages from you I found them hidden in a thread with the
> > subject "sane-pre1-1.0.4 available"
>
> I am taking responsibility for my poor subject. This is a second case I
> made people confused. Time to improve....
>
> > There is nothing new about duplicate efforts on packaging. I noticed the
> > 1.0.3 RPM was done in a way I wouldn't considere myself.
>
> The RPM from redhat contrib directory were indeed made very old way. I
> believe I made 1.0.4 the way Red Hat team would do it.
Some things could be improved.
1. There is no need to change -O2 to -O with a perl script.
This could have been done with a shell script. But it's even better to set
the build parameters by setting $RPM_OPT_FLAGS properly.
2. the backend sets something for xscanimage in %install.
Why does the backend bother with setting files for the frontend?
3. I found the find-scanner and xerox tools usefull in the past.
I'll do some testing and send you a diff for the SPEC file.
Hugo.
-- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- This message has not been checked and may contain harmfull content.-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 06 2001 - 09:35:27 PST