Hi all!
Nick Lamb <njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 06:03:02PM -0500, Statux wrote:
> > Did they ever fix their _little_ problem with gcc 2.96 and the fact that
> > they didn't even bother to note that it's a development version that
> > produces incompatible object code.. such code that will never work with
> > anything else even in future releases?
>
> SANE is not written in C++. The Unix C ABI is a de facto standard and is
> not affected by the endless twiddling of Stroustrup and Co. Perhaps
> this question would be better asked of some people who are doomed to
> use one of the many variants of C++?
Could you explain me (or us) how you got to these prehistoric opinion
about c++?? There IS the ANSI C++ standard. And writing good c++ code
leads directly to well organized and maintainable programs! - Not
compareable with the trange spaghetti code in much c-programs. And
even if there would be different c++ "standards" I simply would take
gcc's g++ ...
> Nick.
>
> --
> Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
>
k33p h4ck1n6 and much fun with "C"
René
-- René Rebe (Registered Linux user: #127875) http://www.rene.rebe.myokay.net/ -Germany-Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 20 2000 - 07:19:56 PST