Hi,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:57:11AM -0600, Arno A. Karner wrote:
> split into two packages majorver.api-version.patch level
> keep even api versions stable, odd ones development-beta
> thats been working for the linux kernel since i can remember
> this allows you to output relativly stable test stuff because it will be
> up to the developers when to cut a release on odd numbers,
I don't think that this is necessary for SANE. Release cycles are
relatively short (compared to Linux kernel) and we shouldn't split our
(short) time on too many targets. I think the current model works
pretty well. However, we will probably have two different source trees
for a while when (if?) SANE 2 development starts.
> people who
> test won't have to deal with cvs, and will give them a solid tag for bug
> reports. instead of i think i checked it out at noon, noon ? what time
> zone are you in?
Is this really a problem? CVS checkins aren't that often and I don't
remember reading a report dealing with this kind of problem. However,
we may start releasing snapshots again.
> i was using 0.73 on redhat 5.2 was working fine, upgraded my boxes to
> 6.2 now that 7.0 is out, got 1.0.3 ran configure, it compiled, it
> installed, both xcam and xscanimage core dump with nasty gtk error
> messages
Could you send the error messages? Maybe your device wasn't found. In
this case something about GTK main loop is printed.
You may also try xsane.
Ciao,
Henning
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 01:54:04 PST