Re: SCSI or Scanner???

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (hmg-ml@gmx.de)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 01:47:39 PDT

Next message: Oliver Schwartz: "Re: Acer 320U"

Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Patch for sane.tex (image polarity)"
In reply to: Martin: "SCSI or Scanner???"
Next in thread: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: SCSI or Scanner???"
Reply: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: SCSI or Scanner???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:20:29PM +0200, Martin wrote:
> # scanimage -d mustek:/dev/sge
> Bad segment list supplied to aha1542.c (1, 0)
> 0: c07b8000 1 0
> cptr c02c7000: 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 a0 7d c0 00 00 00 00
> 00 10 00 00 <0>
> Kernel panic: Foooooooood fight!

Try to limit the SCSI buffer size to 32kb. There was a problem in the
driver(s) for some Adaptec controllers but I thought it's fixed in newer
kernels. With newer Mustek backends (e.g. from SANE 1.0.3) you can just use
"option buffersize 32" in mustek.conf after the definition of your scanner.
See also README.linux (from SANE 1.0.3) and
http://hmg.home.pages.de/sane/trouble.html

Bye,
Henning

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Oliver Schwartz: "Re: Acer 320U"
Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Patch for sane.tex (image polarity)"
In reply to: Martin: "SCSI or Scanner???"
Next in thread: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: SCSI or Scanner???"
Reply: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: SCSI or Scanner???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 01:57:55 PDT