Re: bug in saned

From: Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 21:18:43 PDT

  • Next message: abel deuring: "Re: scsi command queuing"

    [Jochen Eisinger]
    > I avoid this by
    > a) adding a field "u_int docancel : 1;" to struct Handle.
    >
    > b) In process_request I add to SANE_NET_CANCEL "handle[h].docancel = 1;"
    >
    > c) and at the and of do_scan where process_request is called I add
    > "if (handle[h].docancel) break;" and to the line
    > handle[h].scanning=0; I add "handle[h].docancel=0;".
    >
    >
    > d) in start_scan I add at the end to the line handle[h].scanning =
    > 1; the line "handle[h].docancel=0;"
    >
    > e) again in process_request I add to SANE_NET_START after the line
    > handle[h].scanning=0 the line "handle[h].docancel=0".

    Why where SIGPIPE not catched in the first place? Do you have a
    patch? Could this bug be related to the problem people reports when
    running a net scanner on localhost? 

    -- 
##>  Petter Reinholdtsen  <##  |  pere@td.org.uit.no

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 21:07:59 PDT