Re: scsi command queuing

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Wed Jun 28 2000 - 15:13:23 PDT

  • Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: scsi command queuing"

    Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:

    > Same here. I looked at the scanning times when the backend does nothing but
    > getting data from the scanner and ignoring it. There was no big change in
    > scanning time (about 5 %). With the original SCSI adapter the Mustek
    > scanners are about twice as slow as with Windows despite large (4 MB) SCSI
    > buffers and tweaking the Linux SCSI driver.

    4 MB images are not the problem of the umax backend.

    Up to 300dpi A4 page (25MB) everything is ok, 400 dpi (45MB) works with some backtracks.
    500 dpi is unusable slow because of endless backtracktracks.

    Bye
    Oliver 

    --
Homepage:       http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
sane-umax:      http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
xsane:          http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
E-Mail:         mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

    --
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 28 2000 - 15:11:00 PDT