Re: Test for S20 support

From: Peter Daum (gator@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 05:06:34 PDT

Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"

Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "call for testers of usb device driver"
In reply to: Peter Daum: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Next in thread: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Next in thread: John Fremlin: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Daum wrote:

...
> I have a S20, but no other USB scanner - I can't tell whether I
> set things up correctly. Here's what I did:
...

What I probably should have mentioned, too:
this is referring to sane 1.0.2
I am normally using kernel version 2.2.15 with the
"usb-2.3.47-for-2.2.14" backport. (running Linux 2.3.99-pre8
and/or the "alternate" uhci driver doesn't make any major
difference - in any case I just get a timeout).

Regards,
Peter

-- 
                                             __o  
     Peter Daum <gator at cs.tu-berlin.de> _'\<_ 
       - pgp messages welcome -       ____(_)/(_)
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "call for testers of usb device driver"
In reply to: Peter Daum: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Next in thread: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Next in thread: John Fremlin: "Re: Test for S20 support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 21 2000 - 05:32:18 PDT