Re: Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?

From: pixel fairy (pixelfairy@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2000 - 12:25:56 PST

Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: noisy umax astra 2200"

Previous message: Andrew Hutchings: "Mustek 6000CX with SCSI scanner"
In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oliver Rauch wrote:

> Hi,
>
> did someone test sane-umax-1.0 build 19 with output bit depth greater thang 8/24 bpp
> and "custom gamma table" enabled?
>
> It should not produce any dark images any more - correct?

just tried it on astra 2200 the options were 8 and 12. got "preview cannot handle bit
depth 16"
this was in xscanimage

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: noisy umax astra 2200"
Previous message: Andrew Hutchings: "Mustek 6000CX with SCSI scanner"
In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Did someone test sane-umax build 19 with output bit depth >8bpp ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 28 2000 - 12:14:32 PST