Re: Snapshot frequenzy before next release?

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 08:16:19 PST

Next message: S.P.Sheriff: "URGENT: Adaptec 2904/Umax 2200SU confirmation"

Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax scanners impossible to get"
In reply to: Bill Wohler: "Re: Snapshot frequenzy before next release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bill Wohler wrote:

> Oliver Rauch <oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE> writes:
> > - create a new version at least every three months
>
> I agree with Oliver--I like to see minor releases quarterly too.
>
> Question: are snapshots really necessary? Isn't the anonymous CVS
> repository sufficient?

Not really necessary, but they are good to make tests because you can
say it is the version 2000-03-xx and the programmers can take a look
at the code of that version.

Bye
Oliver

-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: S.P.Sheriff: "URGENT: Adaptec 2904/Umax 2200SU confirmation"
Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax scanners impossible to get"
In reply to: Bill Wohler: "Re: Snapshot frequenzy before next release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 21 2000 - 08:05:28 PST