speed of the the latest cvs (yesterday) and Kernel 2.3.46

From: Rene Rebe (rene.rebe@myokay.net)
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 13:27:06 PST

Next message: Bill Wohler: "Re: xsane as root"

Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Permissions of /dev/sg* and xsane, xscanimage (was Re: Report on , last CVS snapshot)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi, out there!

/* I had to resend this, because I was subscribt with my old eMail-adr
... I hope it will only apear once ;-) */

Because of the major improvements of the generic scsi interface in the
2.3 kernel series (I thought there are some ...) I updated my server
to the 2.3.46 Kernel and recompiled sane (yesterday-cvs).

I wanted to make some benchmarks for my avision-backend web-page and
noticed that this new combination is MUCH SLOWER!

The Avision is connected to an Adaptec AHA-2940-U with pentium 120.

With 2.2.12 and a end-january-cvs an a4 - 400dpi - color scan took
180s.

With 2.2.46 and the yesterday-cvs the same scan took 236s! Which is
56s (31%) slower ...!

Does anyone has the same problem?? Or maybe know what could be wrong??

(I hope the english is "readable"...)

k33p h4ck1n6 René

-- Registered Linux user: #127875

Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Bill Wohler: "Re: xsane as root"
Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Permissions of /dev/sg* and xsane, xscanimage (was Re: Report on , last CVS snapshot)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 24 2000 - 13:23:18 PST