[Bill Wohler]
> Just so it's clear, you mean that "cvs update -d -rDEVEL_1_9" is
> correct, but unnecessary (because the snapshot includes CVS/Tag
> files).
Yes.
> The reason I ask is that those of us who have gotten the sources
> directly via CVS and not via the snapshot who want the latest and
> greatest should be using "cvs update -d -rDEVEL_1_9" and not "cvs
> update -d". Right?
If you followed the description on
<URL:http://www.student.uit.no/~pere/linux/sane/cvs-server.html> you
will already have a CVS copy of DEVEL_1_9. If you checked out the
source without -rDEVEL_1_9, you will need to specify it during 'cvs
update -d' to get the current development version.
> By the way, the documentation bug I reported earlier is the only
> thing I've seen so far. scanimage is otherwise working fine (HP
> Photosmart SCSI on Linux 2.2.1).
I hope smarter people the me will comment on the SCSI problems you
discovered. :-)
I am glad the current CVS version works fine. If everything goes
well, we will have a new release soon. :-)
-- ##> Petter Reinholdtsen <## | pere@td.org.uit.no O- <SCRIPT Language="Javascript">window.close()</SCRIPT> http://www.hungry.com/~pere/ | Go Mozilla, go! Go!-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 03 2000 - 23:26:49 PST