Re: 16 bit images

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"
• Previous message: Fabrice Pollet: "GT-9600, GT-7000"
• Maybe in reply to: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"

> Oliver Rauch wrote:
> > You did not see the following line before the block you quoted:
>
> Grumpf, you are right, I'll have to take away the tomatoes from my eyes
> ;-) But that doesn't change the fact that xsane as well as xscanimage
> and scanimage claim not to be able to display my 16 bit image...
>
> Any other idea?
>
>

Yes:
1) Do not use xsane as gimp plugin
2) preview only supports 8bpp
3) for saving take a format that does support 16bpp (see File/Info)

Bye
Oliver

--
EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch




--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"
 Previous message: Fabrice Pollet: "GT-9600, GT-7000"
 Maybe in reply to: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"