Re: 16 bit images

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Zot O'Connor: "updating scsi bois?"
• Previous message: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"
• Maybe in reply to: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"
• Next in thread: Robert Schwebel: "Re: 16 bit images"

> Hi!
>
> Could anyone point out to me what the result of the 16 bit per pixel
> discussion was? I find the discussion in my mail archive but not the
> conclusion ;-) Did you agree on a possibility for the frontend to find
> out about the original bit depth?
>
> It seems to me that all backends available today have problems with 16
> bit gray images as they report that this was not a supported depth. I
> looked into some of the sources and it seems that 16 bit is treated as
> "unknown" at least in scanimage and xsane(0.39). Any idea for a quick
> fix (for the software or my brain) ;-) ?
>
>

Hi Robert,

xsane should work with color and grayscale images with 16 bits/pixel.

Bye
Oliver

--
EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch




--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Zot O'Connor: "updating scsi bois?"
 Previous message: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"
 Maybe in reply to: Robert Schwebel: "16 bit images"

 Next in thread: Robert Schwebel: "Re: 16 bit images"