Re: problem getting a snapscan to work

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"
• Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"

Hi Joakim,

[...]

> it now strikes me that the problem might be that the scanner needs
> termination,
> but it's unclear how to do this, because the scanner has one db25
> port
> and one centronics
> port. any snapscan users who now if it needs termination?

It's different. My Snapscan needs an active termination on Adaptec
2940, but on my Adaptec 1560 no active and no passive termination can
help, only another scanner with termination inside will get them
running.

I think, you should test active terminators.

Greetings
Karl-Heinz

-- 
E-Mail: Karl-Heinz Guenster <karl-heinz.guenster@t-online.de>
Date: 18-Oct-99
Time: 17:58:43

-- 

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com





 Next message: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"
 Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"