Re: RGBI (was Re: xsane-0.31 available)

Nick Lamb (njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Wed, 4 Aug 1999 05:43:23 +0100 (GMT)

On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Steve Gunnell wrote:

> The sensible way to do it would be to have SANE_FRAME_1CH,
> SANE_FRAME_3CH, and SANE_FRAME_4CH. Each channel
> is then assignable to a destination in the front end. The interface from
> the front end to the image manipulation tool defines how the data may
> be mapped.
>
> Ok maybe you don't want to change the definitions that much. So
> keep SANE_FRAME_RGBA where A means Auxillary. Then have
> the front end allow the user to select how the Auxillary channel is to
> be passed on. So Oliver can pass it to Gimp as an Alpha channel
> because that is how he wants to use it and Nick and others can
> pass it across as a seperate (named) image layer.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Steve Gunnell
>
> Nick Lamb wrote:
> [Oliver and Nick's discussion deleted]
>
>
> --
> Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
>

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com