Re: Microtek E3 won't scan, but II-G okay (SANE-OS/2)

ithomae (irv.thomae@succinct.com)
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:00:45 -0400

Matto Marjanovic wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> I (the microtek(1) author) have essentially been in hibernation for the
> last 7 months --- I haven't even used my own scanner; I haven't even
> tried xsane!
> This weekend I'll download fresh source code and get back into the
> swing of things, i.e. try to remember the last few things I was
> trying to do with the backend.
>
Hooray, and welcome back from hibernation!!!


> Off the very top of my head, look through the backend man page and
> try the "no precal" option --- there is some kind of calibration
> that some scanners do on color images, which ends up making them
> miss the first 1/2 cm of the scanning tray; the backend by default
> trys to calibrate once, and then shut it off for successive scans.
> This is tricky, because the scanner hangs if it is not calibrated
> at all. Maybe something is sending some kind of reset to the scanner,
> so it loses the calibration info? It's been a while.
> Like I said, it will take me a few days to get rev'ved up....
>
> -matt marjanovic

I (a would-be user of SANE-OS2) believe I've tried inserting "#option
no precal" into the "microtek.conf" file, but to no avail. Even though
the list of capabilities reported by the E3 does include
precal-suppression, every "scanimage" run seems to start with a precal.

Of course, many aspects of configuration seem to be different when one
compares Linux-SANE and OS/2-SANE, (probably because the filesystems
themselves are so different), so maybe Yuri can reassure us whether/how
"#option ..." lines actually get processed?

Irv Thomae

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com